Have Technology Taken over Some People Lives Essay Example for Free

Have Technology Taken over Some People Lives bear witnessIs there a concern about people becoming too dependent on engineering? Do you think too very much technology is too much for your children? Does technology affect the forefront? Some of us think that there is a possibility that too much technology is touching our children. They seem to not get the concept of things. Kids today cant seem to think in a rational way. Everything done for children is by some type of technology. Technology is taught at such a young age that kids dont get the opportunity to learn on their own and by the time they arrive teenage it seems to become more evident. Sarah Harris in a MailOne article Too much earnings use can damage teenagers brains says, Excessive net use may cause move of teenagers brains to waste away, a study reveals. Scientists discovered signs of atrophy of grey-headed matter in the brains of heavy net users that grew worse over time. This could affect their concentration and memory, as well as their ability to make decisions and notice goals. It could also reduce their inhibitions and lead to inappropriate behavior. Researchers took MRI brain scans from 18 university students, aged 19, who spent 8 to 13 hours a day playing games online, six days a week.The students were classified as internet addicts after answering eight questions, including whether they had tried to give up using computers and whether they had lied to family members about the sum up of time they spent online. compared them with a control group of 18 students who spent fewer than two hours a day on the internet. One set of MRI images focused on grey matter at the brains wrinkled surface, or cortex, where the processing of memory, emotions, speech, sight, hearing and motor control occurs.Comparing grey matter betwixt the two groups revealed atrophy within several sm totally regions of all the online addicts brains. The scans showed that the longer their internet addiction contin ued, the more serious the damage was. The researchers also found changes in deep-brain tissue foretelled white matter, through which messages pass between different areas of grey matter in the nervous system. These geomorphologic abnormalities were probably associated with running(a) impairments in cognitive control, they say. The researchers added that these abnormalities could have made the teenagers more easily internet dependent, hardly concluded they were the consequence of IAD (internet addiction dis mark).Our results suggested long-term internet addiction would result in brain structural alterations, they said. The study, published in the PLoS ONE journal, was carried out by neuroscientists and radiologists at universities and hospitals in China, where 24million youths are estimated to be given over to the internet. Wake-up call Dr Aric Sigman said it was a shame that we needed photos of brains to realise that sitting in front of a screen is not good for childrens health In Britain, children spend an average of five hours and 20 proceeding a day in front of TV or computer screens, according to estimates by the market-research delegacy Childwise. Dr Aric Sigman, a fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine, described the Chinese research as a wake-up call.He said It strikes me as a terrible shame that our society requires photos of brains shrinking in order to take seriously the common-sense assumption that long hours in front of screens is not good for our childrens health. Baroness Greenfield, prof of pharmacology at Oxford University, described the results as very striking. She said It shows theres a very clear relationship between the number of years these young people have been disposed to the internet and changes in their brains. We need to do more experiments and we need to invest more money in research and have more studies like this.The neuroscientist has previously warned there could be a link between childrens poor attention spans and the use of computers and social-networking websites. She is concerned that not enough attention is being stipendiary to evidence that computer use is changing young peoples brains. Professor Karl Friston, a neuroscientist at University College London, told the Scientific American journal the techniques used in the small-scale study were rigorous. He said It goes against intuition, nevertheless you dont need a large sample size. That the results show anything significant at all is very telling.